Sweet syndrome L98.2

Sweet 1964

Rare, acute, high-fever systemic disease with disturbance of the general condition, arthralgias, neutrophilic leukocytosis and an exanthema consisting of disseminated, painful, succulent, papular or plaque-like elevations.

The Sweet syndrome is the prototypical representative of the so-called"neutrophilic dermatoses".

Depending on the aetiology, 5 groups can be distinguished:

1. Classical or idiopathic type, according to the initial description of Sweet
2. Paraneoplastic type
3. Infectious or autoimmune disease associated type
4. drug-induced type
5. Pregnancy-associated type.

Cause often unexplained (idiopathic sweet syndrome)

Infections: Interpretation as infectious - (about 60-80% of cases) allergic event. Infections are mainly of the upper respiratory tract or intestine (salmonellosis, yersiniosis); non-tuberculous mycobacterioses (NTM), chronic inflammatory bowel disease (CED), especially Crohn's disease, may also be the cause.

Basic malignant diseases (approx. 20%): Predominantly in haematological proliferative processes, especially in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), in myelodysplastic syndrome, more rarely in urogenital malignancies. Often the Sweet Syndrome precedes the diagnosis of malignoma.

Medication: Triggered by the following drugs: minocycline, cotrimoxazole, carbamazepine, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (e.g. filgrastim), nitrofurantoin and retinoic acids. The proportion of drug-induced sweet syndromes is estimated at about 5%. The skin changes occur about 7-8 days after the first intake of the drug (Walker DC et al. 1996).

Pathogenetically, an activation of the neutrophil granulocytes by dermally deposited immune complexes with subsequent activation of neutrophil-associated mediators (granulocyte [PMN]-elastase, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) is discussed. Other cytokines involved: IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, interferon gamma.

In classic or idiopathic cases, there is a clear preference for the female sex (80%). Occurrence mostly between the ages of 30 and 60. Very rarely occurring in infants, mostly during the first year of life. There is no sex preference in malignant basic diseases.

Especially on the face, neck, extensor sides of the arms and legs, torso.

Rarely mucous membrane involvement.

Usually high fever occurs 3-7 days before the skin symptoms.

• Integument: Development of reddish-livid, succulent, pressure-marked, infiltrated papules which confluent into nodules and plaques. The pronounced inflammatory oedema creates the impression of blistering ("illusion of vesiculation"), sometimes with the formation of small blisters. Later pustular formation is possible. Central brightening and marginal progression leads to the formation of bizarrely shaped, abnormal plaques. No formation of ulcerations, no scarring of the skin lesions.
• Extracutaneous manifestations: Polyarthritis (in about 50-60% of patients) with rapidly changing, very painful swelling of the large and middle joints. Frequently fever (44%), myalgia, nephritis, hepatitis, conjunctivitis (about 30%) or iridocyclitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, sterile osteomyelitis; rarely aseptic meningitis, rarely pancreatitis.

Highly accelerated SPA and increased CRP (in approx. 80-90% of patients), leukocytosis (44%) with neutrophilia (63%) and left-shifting; lymphopenia. Pathologically found are: alkaline phosphatase (approx. 40-50%), transaminases (15-20%), anaemia (30-50% in malignant basic diseases), thrombocytopenia, proteinuria, HLA-Bw54 detection (20-30%). Positive detection of p- ANCA has been described.

• Papillary body oedema up to subepidermal blister formation; spongiosis or subcorneal blisters or pustules are possible but rather rare. The epidermis is usually inconspicuous. Very dense infiltration of the upper and middle dermis, occasionally also of the subcutis, consisting of neutrophil granulocytes (a clonality of neutrophil infiltrates has been described) without signs of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. A leukocytoclasia is mild or absent. Erythrocyte extravasations are evident. In later stages the infiltrate changes to lymphocytes and histiocytes.
• Histological pattern: Superficial, diffuse, neutrophil dermatitis.
• Variant: Histiocytoid sweet syndrome with diffuse infiltration of immature neutrophilic, mononuclear histiocytoid appearing granulocytes (promyelocytes: myeloperoxidase positive).

  Notice! Clinical exclusion of chronic myeloid leukemia is required.

• The following algorithm can be used for schematization:

  Histopathological algorithm of Sweet's syndrome (lowest common denominator:italics, leading symptoms:bold) varies according to Ratzinger et al. 2105

  Dense neutrophilic infiltrate in the dermis

  Capillaries recessed

  perivascular leukocytoclasia

  Damage to endothelial cells

  Fibrin in/around vessel walls

  Perivascular extravasation of erythrocytes

  Edema in the papillary dermis

  Collagen degeneration

  Variable number of eosinophils

  No plasma cells or fibrosclerosis

• Clinical:
  • Erythema exsudativum multiforme: In the early phase of the disease clinically-morphologically similar picture. However, erythema exsudativum multiforme usually lacks fever and neutrophil leucocytosis! In the full picture of the erythema exsudativum multiforme with development of the EEM coccardium, DD becomes clear.
  • Polymorphic light dermatosis: Occurs after UV exposure (sun pattern!), no fever, no neutrophil leucocytosis, severe itching.
  • Acute urticaria: Clinical determination of the wheals (volatility of the efflorescences is proven by marking). No fever! No neutrophil leukocytosis.
  • Urticaria vasculitis: Pronounced chronicity over many years (untypical for Sweet syndrome). Exanthema characterized by fever attacks, small spots, maculopapular, itchy or painful. Neutrophilic leukocytosis is possible. Frequently arthralgias and arthritides (also possible in the Sweet Syndrome). Frequently swelling of lymph nodes. Possibly positive ANA and signs of systemic lupus erythematosus. Histological signs of vasculitis are diagnostic.
  • Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: Especially in highly acute course with disseminated plaques a similar picture can develop (especially in erythema exsudativum multiforme-like lesions). The neutrophil leucocytosis is always missing in the blood count. Histology and immunohistology are diagnostic.
  • Varicella in adults: Pay attention to the typical distribution pattern of varicella (incl. capillitium, oral mucosa). This distribution is completely untypical for the Sweet Syndrome. The prominent development of the vesicles or blisters speaks against the Sweet Syndrome (vesicles in Sweet Syndrome are multilocular within the lesions!) No neutrophil leukocytosis!
  • Drug exanthema (maculo-papular): No fever, no neutrophil leukocytosis. No marked feeling of illness. Connection with altered or intercurrent drug administration can often be established.
  • Bullous pemphigoid: In some cases no development of the clinically pathological blisters. Thus the clinical leading symptom "bulging (firm) bladder" and the clear clinical assignment to the blister-forming diseases is omitted. No fever, no neutrophil leucocytosis. Serology, histology and IF are conclusive.
• Histological:
  • Leucocytoclastic vasculitis: Clinically mostly excluded. Histologically decisive is the proof of vasculitis (swelling of the vessel wall) with leukocytoclasia and perivascular nuclear dust.
  • Erythema elevatum diutinum: Rare disease! In the early stage always signs of leukocytoclastic vasculitis with leukocytoclasia and nuclear dust and fibrin in the vessel walls. Epidermis and skin appendages remain unaffected. Clinically, the acuteity of Sweet's syndrome is missing.
  • Rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatitis: dense, interstitial, dermal, neutrophilic infiltrate, no evidence of vasculitis; focal epitheliotropy with spongiotic vesiculation of pustular formation possible.
  • Pyoderma gangraenosum: ulceration and abscess with dense diffuse granulocytic infiltrate.
  • Urticaria: Only slight infiltrate; no significant involvement of neutrophilic granulocytes.
  • Urticarial vasculitis: Differently intensive characteristics of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. In many patients (especially if not relapsing-active), however, only superficial and profound perivascular round cell infiltrates are found, to which eosinophilic granulocytes are added in varying densities.
  • Erysipelas: Only moderately pronounced infiltrates of neutrophil granulocytes, especially in the upper and middle dermis.
  • Eosinophilic cellulitis (Wells syndrome): Focal dense infiltrates, perivascular and interstitially stored, almost exclusively from eosinophilic granulocytes. Focal, polygonally bounded eosinophilic flame figures in the dermis.

Blank external preparations, e.g. lotio alba or Ung. emulsif. aq., if necessary, moderately effective glucocorticoid lotions (e.g. Betagalen Lotio, Betamethason Lotio R030 ).

• If necessary, in the presence of an infection, treatment of the underlying disease with consistent systemic antibiotics.
• Glucocorticoids: Very good response rate! Initial medium dosage, e.g. prednisone 1.0-1.5 mg/kg bw/day i.v. or p.o. over 4-6 weeks then gradual reduction depending on response to therapy. Risk of relapse if the dose falls below a critical threshold dose.
• Alternatively: acetylsalicylic acid and indomethacin in medium dosage (indomethacin is particularly effective for frequently occurring arthralgias).
• Alternatively: Colchicum 2-3 times/day 0.6 mg p.o. or DADPS 2 times/day 50 mg p.o. Own experience is not very positive regarding the latter therapies. Therefore, in our opinion, there are no effective alternatives to glucocorticoid treatment.
• Successful therapy approaches have been described with Ciclosporin A, Dapsone and IVIG.

Favourable, even without therapy healing within weeks to months. Under therapy dramatic improvement. However, 50% of patients relapse after therapy-induced or spontaneous healing. In drug-induced sweet syndrome, the exanthema heals within 3-30 days after discontinuation of the drug in question. The fever subsides within 3-5 days.

Due to its histopathology characterized by neutrophil granulocytes, the Sweet Syndrome together with other dermatoses is classified as a so-called neutrophilic dermatosis.

1. Banse C et al (2015) Occurrence of Sweet syndrome under anti-TNF. Clin Rheumatol PubMed PMID: 26292633.
2. Bayer-Garner IB et al (2003) Sweet syndrome in multiple myeloma: a series of six cases. J Cutan catheter 30: 261-264
3. Brown AM et al (2002) Recurrent tenosynovitis in Sweet's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41: 1067-1069
4. Callen JP et al (2002) Neutrophilic dermatoses. Dermatol Clin 20: 409-419
5. Clarke K et al (2018) Allergic and Immunologic Perspectives of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
   Clin Rev Allergy Immunol doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-86903
6. Cohen PR, Kurzrock R (2002) Sweet's syndrome: a review of current treatment options. At J Clin Dermatol 3: 117-131
7. Cohen PR (2015) Proton pump inhibitor-induced Sweet's syndrome: report of acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis in a woman with recurrent breast cancer. Dermatol Pract Concept 5:113-119
8. Gambichler T (2000) Sweet's syndrome with eruption of pustulosis palmaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 14: 327-329
9. Heymann WR (2015) BRAF inhibitor-induced neutrophilic dermatoses: a bitter-"sweet" scenario. Skinmed 13:132-134
10. Kato T et al (2002) Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet's syndrome) with nodular episcleritis and polyneuropathy. Int J Dermatol 41: 107-109
11. Kemmett D, Hunter JAA (1990) Sweet's syndrome: A clinicopathological review of twenty-nine cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 23: 503-507
12. Khan Durani B et al (2002) Drug-induced Sweet's syndrome in acne caused by different tetracyclines: case report and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 147: 558-562
13. Malone JC et al (2002) Vascular inflammation (vasculitis) in sweet syndrome: a clinicopathologic study of 28 biopsy specimens from 21 patients. Arch Dermatol 138: 345-349
14. Metz R et al (1990) Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet syndrome). Dermatologist 41: 485-489
15. Emergency A et al (2017) Sweet Syndrome:Revision of diagnostic criteria. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 15: 1081-1089
16. Prasad PV et al (2002) Sweet's syndrome in an infant--report of a rare case. Int J Dermatol 41: 928-930
17. Ratzinger G et al. (2015) The Vasculitis Wheel-an algorithmic approach to cutaneous vasculitis. JDDG 1092-1118
18. Sprague J et al (2015) Cutaneous infection with Mycobacterium kansasii in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome and Sweet syndrome. Cutis 96: E10-12
19. Sweet RD (1964) An acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis. Br J Dermatol 76: 349-356
20. Gelding D et al (2015) Pyoderma gangrenosum and Sweet syndrome: the prototypic neutrophilic dermatosis. Br J Dermatol doi: 10.1111/bjd.13955.
21. Walker DC et al (1996) Trimethoprim-sulfmethoxazole-associated acut febrilic neutrophilic dermatosis: case report and review of drug iduced Sweet`s syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 34:918-923