Candidoses B37.9

Authors: Prof. Dr. med. Peter Altmeyer, Angelika Németh

All authors of this article

Last updated on: 10.09.2022

Dieser Artikel auf Deutsch

Synonym(s)

blastomycetica interdigital erosion; Candidamycosis; Candida mycosis; Candidamycosis interdigital; Candidasis; Candidates; Candidiasis; Candidosis; Granuloma candidamyceticum; Moniliasis; mucocutaneous candidiasis; Oidiomycosis; Oidomycosis; Oidosis; Thrush

Definition
This section has been translated automatically.

Localized, also disseminated infection of the skin and/or mucous membranes as well as systemic infections (especially in immunocompromised patients), caused by dimorphic fungi (yeast fungi), predominantly by Candida albicans.

Invasive (systemic) candidiasis mainly affects patients with additional risk factors (prolonged immunosuppression, neutropenia, long-term therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics - very old - very young - very sick).

Pathogen
This section has been translated automatically.

Round to oval yeast fungi; usually present in sprouting form, in tissue (as invasive growing fungus) also as filamentous form (pseudomycelium).

Most frequent representative is C. albicans, besides rarer kinds like C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei. The human pathogenic Candida species are common mucosal saprophytes. Candida albicans forms on very characteristic thick-walled permanent spores, the chlamydospores.

The differentiation of the versch. Differentiation of the various species can be carried out by means of germ tube tests, assimilation and fermentation tests or molecular methods(PCR, MALDI-TOF test).

The following virulence factors are important for Candida albicans:

  • Colonization: short regeneration times broad pH and temperature range Adherence to epithelium (mannoproteins)
  • Tissue invasion: expression of lytic enzymes (the secretory aspartate proteinases (SAP) and the phospholipases- Calderone RA et al. 2001), formation of particular morphological structures (germ tubes); alternation between unicellular yeast form and multicellular filamentous form (dimorphism).
  • Tissue persistence: "phenotypic switch" "antigenic mimicry" = masking with endogenous structures, the ability to form biofilms.

Note: Secretory aspartate proteinases (SAP) are differentially expressed under variable environmental conditions and in different types of infection (Staib P et al. 2008). Currently, 10 SAP genes are known whose diverse functions are significant for C. albicans virulence. In addition to tissue invasion, they also play important roles in adhesion, biofilm formation, phenotypic switching, and dimorphism, among others (Staib P et al. 2008). The ability of C. albicans to switch between two different morphological forms, unicellular yeast form and multicellular filamentous form (hyphe) is considered a major virulence factor (dimorphism - Ramage G et all. (2005). Switching between the different growth forms is possible in response to different environmental conditions (Ernst JF 2000). A distinctive feature ofC. albicans and C. dubliniensis is the formation of pseudohyphae (germ tube formation) and chlamydospores under specific conditions (Calderone RA et al. 2001; Staib P et al. 1999). This special ability is used for differentiation from other Candida species. Hyphal formation is considered to be of major importance, as this form of growth is predominantly found during tissue invasion.

Classification
This section has been translated automatically.

Occurrence/Epidemiology
This section has been translated automatically.

Yeasts of the genus Candida are found as saprophyte in low concentrations in a part of the healthy population:

  • stool > 50%.
  • Oropharynx 30%
  • vagina 25%
  • Skin, rarely without symptoms of disease.

Etiopathogenesis
This section has been translated automatically.

Infection with Candida, mostly Candida albicans. Systemic predisposing factors (very old, very young, very sick) include:

diabetes mellitus, obesity, antibiotic therapy, immune deficiency, pregnancy, Cushing's disease, Addison's disease, hypoparathyroidism, hypothyroidism, immune deficiencies as a result of immunosuppressive therapy(glucocorticoid therapy, cytostatic therapy) or HIV infection, taking ovulation inhibitors, working in a humid environment, wearing occluding clothing for long periods.

Occurrence of invasive Candida infections are almost exclusively observed in immunocompromised persons!

Clinical features
This section has been translated automatically.

S.u. and the respective clinical pictures.

Candidastomatitis or esophagitis (possibly dysphagic symptoms) are important indications of a profound immunosuppression (e.g. HIV infection).

Systemic candida infections: Patients with complex immunosuppressive disorders (possibly in combination with neutropenia, long-term antibiotic therapy, chemotherapy) may develop candida fungaemia and disseminated visceral candidosis (septicaemia) with infestation of the liver, spleen, kidneys, ocular fundus (cotton wool foci), endocarditis (I33.0) or osteomyelitis (M86.-).

A typical clinical picture for patients with long-term neutropenia (e.g. after stem cell transplantation) is hepatosplenic candidiasis with multiple splenic and hepatic abscesses (van Prehn J et al. 2017).

Diagnosis
This section has been translated automatically.

Clinical symptoms indicating candidosis.

Mycological diagnosis; the shoot cells typical for yeasts become visible in a native preparation on KOH-basis. Exclusion of bacterial infections.

Culture: In view of the resistance of some Candida species (e.g. Candida glabrata or other non-albicans species) to various bacterial pathogens, a culture is recommended. Antimycotic agents, the identification of the species is useful. If only one single colony is detected in culture, a single commensal yeast cell is suspected. The cultural identification of a species is still necessary for all chronic relapses, especially in immunocompromised patients.

Peptide nucleic acid fluorescence interest situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) method: This method allows a faster differentiation of C. albicans and C. non-albicans species compared to the classical diagnostic method of germ tube formation.

Furthermore, the Candida species can also be distinguished biochemically by evaluating different assimilation profiles (Pappas PG 2006).

PAS-stains: Detection of Candida in tissue sections using periodic acid-ship (PAS) staining.

Systemic Candida infection: The detection of a systemic Candida infection is often difficult, because on the one hand the clinical signs are unspecific and on the other hand the detection of yeast cells from blood culture is often not possible. Even in cases of disseminated invasive candidosis, for example in immunocompromised patients, blood cultures are negative in more than 50 % (Holzheimer RG et al. 2002).

Serological antibody detection is only of limited use due to insufficient sensitivity and specificity (Ruhnke M et al. 2002).

A wood-light examination is unsuitable for the detection of candidosis.

Differential diagnosis
This section has been translated automatically.

Bacterial infections due to streptococci or staphylococci; erythrasma; intertrigo; pustulosis of other etiology.

Therapy
This section has been translated automatically.

With the increasing number of immunocompromised patients and the introduction of new therapeutic methods, there was also an increase in life-threatening fungal infections. Also problematic was the increase in resistance to available antifungal agents.

Two main groups of antifungal agents, polyenes and azoles, target the cell membrane, as do allylamines. The only polyene that can be used systemically is amphotericin B, which was the only available antifungal agent in the therapy of systemic mycoses for almost 30 years.

The mechanism of action of this class of compounds is based on binding to the sterol/ergosterol of the cell membrane, resulting in pore formation. The resulting increase in permeability of the cell membrane leads to cell death. Secondary resistance to amphotericin B or to nystatin is rare. However, some species such as C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii are primarily resistant to amphotericin B. The mechanism of polyene resistance in Candida appears to be associated with a reduction in ergosterol content.

One problem with amphotericin B is the side effects it causes (especially nephrotoxicity). The use of the newer liposomal amphotericin B preparations has reduced nephrotoxicity, with comparable efficacy.

The imidazoles (e.g., ketoconazole) and triazoles (e.g., fluconazole) inhibit ergosterol synthesis by blocking the cytochrome P450-dependent enzyme 14α-demethylase. This results in accumulation of toxic ergosterol precursors, decrease in ergosterol with resulting disruption of membrane structure and inhibition of some membrane-bound enzymes. The widespread and, especially in HIV patients, long-term use of azoles has led to an accumulation of infections by azole-resistant Candida strains and to a selection of Candida species with intrinsic resistance to fluconazole such as C. krusei and C. glabrata. Fluconazole is the most commonly used of the azole substance group against Candida infections.

Several mechanisms leading to resistance have now been identified:

  • Up-regulation of multidrug efflux transporter genes (ABC transporter genes and major facilitator gene).
  • Amino acid substitution in the Erg11p protein (=target structure of azoles)
  • Up-regulation of the ERG11 gene
  • Changes in sterol composition due to lack of activity of sterol desaturase encoded by Erg3 gene.

Voriconazole, a member of the triazoles, has a broad spectrum of activity including both Candida and Aspergillus (Walsh TJ et al. (2002). It is approved in Europe for the treatment of severe, fluconazole-resistant Candida infections, among other uses. In November 2006, posaconazole was approved for prophylaxis and first-line therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis. In European studies, the vast majority of Candida isolates showed high sensitivity to these azoles (Tortorano AM et al.2006).

Allylamines: Allylamines with their main representative terbinafine also interfere with ergosterol biosynthesis, their target being squalene epoxidase. They are used in the treatment of infections by dermatophytes. Resistance has not been reported in humans to date.

5-Flucytosine: 5-Flucytosine, a pyrimidine analog with fungistatic activity is converted to 5-fluorouracil in the cell by cytosine permease; this interferes with nucleic acid and protein synthesis. In some Candida species, including C. albicans serotype B, C. glabrata, and C. krusei, primary resistance is not uncommon (Perea S et al. 2002). Since secondary resistance also occurs rapidly, 5-flucytosine is predominantly used in combination with amphotericin B or fluconazole. The spectrum of activity includes not only Candida but also Cryptococcus Neoformans.

Echinocandins: Echinocandins are the latest class of substances with a completely new point of attack. They are lipopeptides composed of a cyclic hexapeptide with N-linked fatty acid side chains. Echinocandins exert their antifungal activity by non-competitive inhibition of β-1,3-glucan synthetase, thereby interfering with cell wall biosynthesis (Ghannoum MA et al. 1999). Caspofungin, the first representative of this substance group, was approved by the EMEA in 2001. Various studies have demonstrated good efficacy of caspofungin compared with amphotericin B and fluconazole in the treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis (Villanueva A et al. 2002). Also of clinical importance is the good efficacy of caspofungin against azole-resistant Candida. Overall, echinocandins can be considered an advance in antifungal therapy. The protein Fks1p, the catalytic subunit of β-1,3-glucan synthetase, is thought to be the target of the echinocandins (Douglas CM et al 1997).

S.further under: candidiasis, intertriginous; candidiasis , enteric; candida sepsis; candida granuloma; candidiasis oforal mucosa; vulvovaginal candidiasis;

Literature
This section has been translated automatically.

  1. Brown AL (2003) Caspofungin versus amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 348: 1287-1288
  2. Calderone RA et al (2001) Virulence factors of Candida albicans. Trends in microbiology 9: 327-335

  3. Darmstadt GL, Dinulos JG, Miller Z (2000) Congenital cutaneous candidiasis: clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and management guidelines. Pediatrics 105: 438-444
  4. Douglas CM et al (1997) Identification of the FKS1 gene of Candida albicans as the essential target of 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 41: 2471-2479

  5. Ernst JF (2000) Transcription factors in Candida albicans - environmental control of morphogenesis. Microbiology 146: 1763-1774

  6. Ghannoum MA (2000) Potential role of phospholipases in virulence and fungal pathogenesis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 13: 122-143

  7. Ghannoum MA et al (1999) Antifungal agents: mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 12: 501-517

  8. Holzheimer RG et al (2002) Management of mycoses in surgical patients - review of the literature. European Journal of Medical Research 7: 200-226

  9. Jung EG et al (1994) Systemic treatment of skin candidoses: A randomized comparison of terbinafine and ketoconazole mycosis 3: 361-365
  10. McClelland (2005) Contribution of HIV-1 infection to acquisition of sexually transmitted disease: a 10-year prospective study. J Infect Dis 191: 333-338
  11. Meunier F (1994) Future perspectives of antimycotic therapy. Mycosis 37: 77-82
  12. Mora-Duarte J et al (2002) Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 347: 2020-2029
  13. Ohmit SE et al (2003) Longitudinal study of mucosal Candida species colonization and candidiasis among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive and at-risk HIV-seronegative women. J Infect Dis 188: 118-127
  14. Pappas PG (2006) Invasive candidiasis. Infect Dis Clin N Am 20: 485-506

  15. Perea S et al (2002) Antifungal resistance in pathogenic fungi. Clinical Infectious Diseases 35: 1073-1080

  16. Ramage G et all. (2005) Candida biofilms: an update. Eukaryotic Cell 4: 633-638

  17. Roderick JH (1994) Antifungal drugs on the horizon. On Acad Dermatol 31: 82-85

  18. Ruhnke M et al (2002) Management of mycoses in patients with hematologic disease and cancer - review of the literature. European Journal of Medical Research 7: 227-235

  19. Seebacher C (1999) Candida in dermatology. Mycoses 42 Suppl 1: 63-67
  20. Staib P et al (2008) Tetracycline-inducible expression of individual secreted aspartic proteases in Candida albicans allows isoenzyme-specific inhibitor screening. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 52: 146-156

  21. Staib P et al (1999) Chlamydospore formation on Staib agar as a species-specific characteristic of Candida dubliniensis. mycoses 42: 521-524

  22. Tortorano AM et al.(2006) Candidemia in Europe: epidemiology and resistance. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 27: 359-366

  23. van Prehn J et al (2017) Hepatosplenic Candidiasis Without Prior Documented Candidemia: An Underrecognized Diagnosis? Oncologist 22:989-994.

  24. Villanueva A et al (2002) A randomized double-blind study of caspofungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. The American Journal of Medicine 113: 294-299

  25. Walsh TJ et al (2002) Voriconazole compared with liposomal Amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. The New England Journal of Medicine 346: 225-234

  26. Wildfeuer A et al (1994) Bioavailability of Fluconazole in the skin after oral medication. Mycosis 37: 127-130

  27. Walsh TJ (2002) Echinocandins--an advance in the primary treatment of invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 347: 2070-2072
  28. Yu DT et al (2006) Fluconazole for empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. BMC Infect Dis 6: 173

Disclaimer

Please ask your physician for a reliable diagnosis. This website is only meant as a reference.