Sgargossa criteria

Authors:Prof. Dr. med. Peter Altmeyer, Dr. med. S. Leah Schröder-Bergmann

All authors of this article

Last updated on: 29.10.2020

Dieser Artikel auf Deutsch

Requires free registration (medical professionals only)

Please login to access all articles, images, and functions.

Our content is available exclusively to medical professionals. If you have already registered, please login. If you haven't, you can register for free (medical professionals only).


Requires free registration (medical professionals only)

Please complete your registration to access all articles and images.

To gain access, you must complete your registration. You either haven't confirmed your e-mail address or we still need proof that you are a member of the medical profession.

Finish your registration now

HistoryThis section has been translated automatically.

In 1996, Sgarbossa described the Sgarbossa criteria named after him, with the help of which a myocardial infarction can be detected even in a left bundle branch block with a history of myocardial infarction. These criteria were modified by Smith in 2012 (Sgarbossa 1996 / Smith 2012).

DefinitionThis section has been translated automatically.

A myocardial infarction (MI) with ST elevation(STEMI) is difficult to detect in a previously existing left bundle branch block or ventricularly stimulated rhythm. Sgarbossa et al. therefore examined 262 patients with left bundle branch block in a retrospective study, in each of whom 131 cases had had an MI or no MI (Simon 2017).

The found criteria are added to a respective score:

  • Sgarbossa A: A concordant (same direction as the QRS complex with positive QRS) ST- elevation of ≥ 1 mm in at least one derivation (5 points)
  • Sgarbossa B: there is a concordant ST depression of at least 1 mm in ≥ 1 Derivation of V1, V2 or V3 (3 points)
  • Sgarbossa C: An elevation of the ST section of ≥ 5 mm in a derivation with simultaneously discordant deflection direction in the area of the QRS complex (2 points) (Jahn 2019)

A reasonably reliable statement can be made from a value of ≥ 3 points. A meta-analysis of 10 studies showed a specificity of 98 % and a sensitivity of 20 % (Simon 2017).

Somewhat more exact statements can be made with the modified Sgarbossa criteria according to Smith. The criteria Sgarbossa A and B were retained, Sgarbossa C modified:

There is at least one elevation of the unconformant ST- line of ≥ 1 mm, provided that ≥ measures 25% of the preceding S- wave (Gotthardt 2018).

Note: However, if the Sgarbossa criteria are not present, an infarction cannot be excluded.

LiteratureThis section has been translated automatically.

  1. Gotthardt P et al (2018) Correction: STEMI equivalents and high-risk NSTEMIs . Emergency and rescue medicine . (21) 142 Springer Link https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-018-0412-0
  2. Jahn M et al. (2019) EKG for Emergency Medical Services. Elsevier 129
  3. Sgarbossa E B et al (1996) Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 334 (8): 481 - 487
  4. Simon A et al (2017) Right bundle branch block, left bundle branch block, pacemaker in acute coronary syndrome - can we forget the ECG here? The ischemic ECG: frequent dilemma in the emergency department: myocardial infarction with left bundle branch block. Dtsch med Wochenschr 142 (17) 1324 - 1325
  5. Smith S W et al (2012) Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block With the ST-Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule. Annals of Emergency Medicine 60 (6) 766 - 776

Authors

Last updated on: 29.10.2020